FEDS DOCK LOS ALAMOS

 

xUoC3

Neutrina Detector , Los Alamos, 1999

Feds dock Los Alamos lab in performance review

By SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — The contractor that runs one of the nation’s premier national laboratories has lost out on tens of millions of dollars from the federal government because of what officials call a serious performance failure.

The National Nuclear Security Administration finished its annual evaluation of Los Alamos National Laboratory earlier this month and the overall results aren’t positive. The fee earned by Los Alamos National Security LLC for the 2014 fiscal year was slashed to $6.25 million, a fraction of the $63.4 million the contractor could have earned, according to documents made public Monday.

The NNSA singled out a mishap in February at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in southern New Mexico. That’s where a container packed with radioactive waste from Los Alamos ruptured and forced the plant’s indefinite closure.

Lab Director Charlie McMillan acknowledged the weight that the WIPP mishap had on the evaluation in a memo sent Monday to employees. He said the severity of the event resulted in an unsatisfactory rating when it came to the lab’s operations and infrastructure.

“Although this was a very tough year for the laboratory, I am optimistic that next year will be better. I am determined to do all that I can to make it so,” he told employees.

McMillan also used the memo to highlight some of the successes at the lab over the past year, including being chosen to develop a remote sensor for the Mars 2020 mission and collaborating on a project aimed at characterizing the damage at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan.

However, the mishap at WIPP has spurred more criticism than praise for managers at the nuclear repository and at Los Alamos.

A group of watchdogs in early December called on U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz to slash the fees awarded to Los Alamos, saying its contractual performance was “seriously substandard.” The watchdogs also pointed out that the lab had missed state-imposed deadlines for cleaning up Cold War-era waste on its northern New Mexico campus.

82

LAS ALAMOS, 1945

New Mexico officials have already levied $36.6 million in penalties for permit violations at Los Alamos that stemmed from the radiation leak at WIPP. The state has accused the lab of mixing incompatible waste, treating hazardous waste without a permit and failing to notify regulators about changes in the way waste was being handled.

The state’s investigation is ongoing and more penalties are possible.

The Energy Department has yet to complete its investigation into what caused the container to leak, but officials suspect a chemical reaction in highly acidic waste that was packed with organic cat litter to absorb moisture.

According to the state, experts had notified the lab to stop using organic materials as early as 2012 because of the possible dangers of mixing them with nitrate salts.

The DOE has estimated it could take years and more than a half-billion dollars to get the nuclear repository operating again.

 

losalamosgate

Main Gate, 1944

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “FEDS DOCK LOS ALAMOS

      1. Likewise, and I admire your courage in refusing to betray the trust of a source and in dealing with the cruel result, despite your source coming forward. You truly work for freedom.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Thank-you. For seeing through all the lies and for the words you chose to express that.
        I managed to miss some comments a couple weeks back. I’m sorry I missed yours – and happy I found them, particularly this one.

        Like

  1. Your post remind ed me about Canada being stuck with the cleanup cost for the US initiated and controlled Distant Early Warning System (Dew Line) built in the 50’s to protect the US from a Russian nuclear attack. I remember thinking that these ICBM’s would presumably fall on Canada if shot down and therefore it wasn’t great protection for us and the shit left behind when these 21 stations closed was a significant problem for our First Nations. Thanks for tweaking my memories and my curiosity. Apparently it was finally “cleaned up” in 2013. http://www.canadiancontent.ca/issues/1298dewline.html

    Like

    1. You never know what they really mean by “clean up”, of course! And you can always assume they are lying. It’s so weird how you can just drive right by and even though you can’t go in on a whim, you can arrange some kind of access – school groups, a group tour.
      Like, it’s all still THERE, so much a part of the region’s life, so NORMAL – which makes it all the more haunting, surreal, and creepy.
      Ah…America.
      America the brave….

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s